Search Results

Based on Statement 300 of the General Amended B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice , an organisation can only claim Skills Development Expenditure for Learnerships if an organisation incurred such an expense within their financial year.   Evidence for a Learnership for a B-BBEE Verification under the Skills Development element include, however, are not limited to:   A signed Learnership Agreement; Proof of the expenditure incurred by providing invoices and proof of payment; A certified copy of a Beneficiary’s ID; A completed EEA1; Proof of Payslips; Doctor’s confirmation of Disability (if applicable); and An interview between the Learner and the B-BBEE Rating Agency conducting the B-BBEE Verification.   Skills Development Services  are available to assist Members with B-BBEE Verification requirements under the element of Skills Development.

Xolile Mtembu | 5 April 2026 Former president Thabo Mbeki received significant backlash after his comments on South Africa's unemployment crisis this week. During an interview with eNCA, Mbeki attributed the country's joblessness to shortcomings within the workforce, drawing sharp criticism from various quarters. He ignited outrage when he told the broadcaster: "Why are millions of our people unemployed? The reason they are unemployable is because they don't have the skills that the modern economy and society need." His remarks have been criticised as disconnected from reality, with detractors saying they ignore deeper structural challenges within the economy. Lulaway, a project management leader specialising in youth employment, emphasised that the issue is far more complex. "The root causes are complex, ranging from economic stagnation and poor governance to corruption, a lack of opportunities, and an ongoing skills mismatch between education and industry needs. "This article explores the nature of youth unemployment in South Africa, its underlying causes, and strategies to move forward," said the organisation. Talent development firm, Shaper further reinforced its analysis, highlighting the enduring structural inequalities shaping the labour market. "The persistently high unemployment rate in South Africa is a multifaceted problem stemming from a complex interplay of historical, structural, and socio-economic factors. "The legacy of apartheid continues to cast a long shadow over the South African labour market. The systemic inequalities created by decades of discriminatory policies have left a lasting impact, disproportionately affecting black South Africans," it said. Political analyst Siya Ntombela previously told IOL that while Mbeki's remarks carry some truth, they may be misdirected. "There is a mismatch between what our education offers and what employers need," he said. He went on to shift focus towards historical policy decisions, including those implemented during Mbeki’s tenure in office. "We need to trace the problem back to the education policies and legislation passed by previous governments, including Thabo Mbeki's administration," he said. Ntombela pointed to contentious reforms, such as the closure of vocational, teaching and nursing colleges, arguing that these decisions have had lasting consequences for the country's skills pipeline. He was referring to the post-apartheid overhaul of vocational and technical education, initiated through White Paper 4 on Education and Training (1998). The reforms sought to dismantle a fragmented system of technical colleges and replace it with a consolidated Further Education and Training (FET) framework aimed at aligning education more closely with labour market demands. Enshrined in the Further Education and Training Act of 1998, these changes were implemented in the early 2000s, marking a significant shift in vocational education during Mbeki's presidency. Ntombela also highlighted persistent systemic obstacles, including ongoing electricity disruptions, which continue to hinder practical training reliant on power, thereby deepening the divide between education and employability. He further criticised the broader education system. "It taught teachers and learners to focus on the end assessment rather than holistic learning," he said. Ntombela argued that opposition to raising academic standards has contributed to a cycle of inadequately prepared graduates. "Meaning they wanted and continue to produce certificated unemployable but uneducated citizens who will not be critical of their wrongdoings. "What will Thabo Mbeki do to ensure that young educated South Africans are employable?" he asked. ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://iol.co.za/news/south-africa/2026-04-04-mbeki-blamed-skills-shortage-critics-point-to-deeper-causes/

Boitumelo Kgobotlo | 6th April 2026 Cell C and non-profit organisation GirlCode have partnered in effort to tackle high youth unemployment rates in South Africa. The partnership aims to train and certify 500 unemployed young people in artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing as these are considered skills in demand across various industries worldwide. Zandile Mkwanazi, GirlCode CEO, emphasised that unemployment amongst the young women remains above 60%, saying that taking them through this course might secure them employment into technology-enabled careers. Investing in talent “As a country, we face a stark mismatch between the jobs the economy needs and the skills available. This initiative is a deliberate investment in the talent that will define South Africa’s digital economy, equipping young people with practical, globally relevant skills that unlock opportunity,” said Mkwanazi. Participants will learn AI concepts and cloud fundamentals aligned to industry expectations, before sitting for certification exams that enhance employability both locally and internationally. Mentorship and employer engagement sessions will also support the transition into the technology ecosystem. Women scarce in STEM fields Mkwanazi said women remain underrepresented in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Maths (STEM) fields in South Africa, accounting for just 13% of graduates compared with a global average of 35%. “Accelerating participation in AI and cloud careers is critical to inclusive growth. GirlCode is focused on expanding digital literacy and opening sustainable pathways to employment through targeted skills development and certification linked programmes,” said Mkwanazi. Digital inclusion beyond connectivity Lethiwe Hlatshwayo, Cell C corporate affairs managing executive, said the initiative reflects a wider ambition to drive digital inclusion beyond connectivity.“ Digital inclusion is one of the most powerful enablers of economic participation. Our partnership with GirlCode is about building real pathways to opportunity by equipping young South Africans with future ready AI and cloud skills. “By supporting the training and certification of 500 young people, we are removing barriers to entry and helping to build a more inclusive, skilled workforce that can participate meaningfully in a rapidly evolving digital economy. This collaboration reflects Cell C’s commitment to partnerships for impact and ensuring that nothing stops talent from reaching its potential,” said Hlatshwayo. ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://sundayworld.co.za/business/cell-c-girlcode-partner-to-tackle-youth-unemployment/#goog_rewarded

BBQ Online | 31 March 2026 Our country’s future hinges on the aggressive implementation of BEE with the sole purposes of wiping out poverty and unemployment and integrating blacks into the economy, writes Dr Thami Mazwai. One shudders in disbelief at efforts to scrap black economic empowerment (BEE). If truth be told, BEE never started the full journey but they now say it must be scrapped. This begs the question: “Are blacks the children of a lesser God”. In May 1998, the Black Business Council (BBC) urgently appointed then former ANC secretary general and now president, Cyril Ramaphosa, to chair a BEE Commission as acceptance and implementation of BEE were erratic. From this BBC intervention, and further toing and froing, the Department of Trade and Industry, now Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) ultimately came with Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment legislation in 2003. There is no doubt that there has been some action and major achievements but the ultimate barometer is poverty, unemployment, and inequality (PUI). To add to this is the sustainability of black firms, more so small one. Here are the facts. According to Stats SA, 23.2 million live below R1 415 per person per month. Talk in the townships, villages, and informal settlements is that in some families adults take turns eating so that the children have something. Ai, and to add to this, in some instances take their school feeding packs home so the family eats. Inequality continues to be a huge problem and ours is the highest in the world with the gini-coefficient at .63 to .67 and with 10% of population owning 80% of total wealth. Worse still, inequality within the black community, estimated at close to .6, is on the gallop. The latest unemployment figures, released last Monday, show that unemployment is at a staggering 31.4%. Over 12 million South Africans are jobless. Finally, in terms of black small business survival; more than 80% collapse in their first five years. To add to this 1.3 million of black small businesses have turnovers, not profits, of R18 000 per annum. The Black Industrialists Programme, ostensibly the BEE flagship, is running aground as officials in government and the development finance institutions have difficulty funding businesses with no track record. This results in companies owned by the non-indigenous, virtual fronts, getting support. Fancy, this from people who themselves had no profiles when appointed to these positions. The PUI miseries and small business unsustainability above show that not only is economic growth urgent, but it must be mainly driven by the enterprise and supplier development (ESD) leg of BEE. Integrity also has to be a crucial and compulsory element. It is hoped an expected announcement by Trade, Industry, and Competition (dtic) Minister Parks Tau on BEE will address the above. For the record, the reconstruction of the economy and its activities to serve the common good is not new. Hence, a study by academics Guerrero, Liñán, and Cáceres-Carrasco in developed and developing economies and released in 2021 gives examples of how countries have come with specific interventions to stimulate economic activity in specific localities or population groups. Thus, BEE is not something unusual and in our case it deals with a specific problem that must be corrected for the benefit and betterment of the whole country, not blacks only. What is also problematic is focus on two issues; corruption and so-called “enrichment of the few”. Let us first deal with one, corruption. The focus on corruption is justifiable and it must thus be outrightly condemned. It has reached preposterous levels and the perpetrators simply close their eyes to the suffering and, instead, revel in their latest vehicles, big houses and whiskies. What happened to Ubuntu? But, let us not restrict it to blacks only as it is a cancer involving black and white and is eating the soul of our country. Unfortunately, the government is not dealing with it with the warranted determination, ruthlessness and urgency. On the broader scene and also to bring in the aspect of enrichment; with the wisdom of hindsight it is clear that our approach to BEE was not premised on long term economic growth with the betterment of the black community and society in general at the centre. It was a quick fix approach and did not factor in realities such as the embeddedness of capital and human frailties and desires. Ours was a university student mass meeting attitude, which unfortunately still persists. On the “enrichment of the few” narrative, companies are going to empower in way that will further their interests and those of shareholders. It is natural; the Catholic Church does not appoint a protestant to edit its newspaper. For effective implementation of BEE the ball is in government’s court, that is Tau and his colleagues. Numerous reports on BEE show that implementation is, at best, a by the way and at times apologetic. Since 1995 the development of implementation of BEE was a small section in the then dti and not the foundational pillar of the department as the driver of South Africa’s economy. After all, it was the black majority that was elbowed out of the economy. The Land Acts (1913 and 1936) and Apartheid legislation elbowing blacks out of economic participation are not a figment of the imagination. As an example of lacklustre implementation, nobody can justify why the departments of agriculture nationally and provincially rightly create the emerging farmers programme but do not link it to the school feeding scheme in which the providers of food to schools must source from these emerging farmers, and it is a condition of the contract. Furthermore, the ESD leg which should be compulsory across the economy is the least or worst implemented. Yet, as the Sanlam Gauge reports, it is the most important. China wiped out 95% of its poverty through mass entrepreneurship as a World Bank report shows. The report lauds the Chinese Government’s singleness of purpose to wipe out poverty. Our country’s future hinges on the aggressive implementation of BEE with the sole purposes of wiping out poverty and unemployment and integrating blacks into the economy. Greater focus must be at the lower levels but without abandoning the commanding heights. It is painful to see thousands of our youth clean cars at parking lots for a livelihood. Are these black youths indeed children of a lesser God. This article originally appeared on IOL and is published with permission. https://bbqonline.co.za/scrap-bee-not-while-poverty-joblessness-and-inequality-still-devastate-black-south-africans/

Refiloe Benjamin | 30 March 2026 The Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE) calls on the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) to consider the weight of opposition to its proposed amendments to the B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice. CDE is one of many organisations that have submitted a formal response to the Department calling for the immediate withdrawal of the proposed amendments on the grounds that that they are reckless and will undermine the stated goals of broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE). “CDE believes the proposed changes are reckless. They amount to a massive bet on the idea of a Transformation Fund, a proposal whose details have not even been made public. They will destabilise the structure of existing empowerment policies, impose significant new costs on businesses that have already adapted to current rules, and reduce investment by increasing policy uncertainty,” said Ann Bernstein, executive director of CDE. “The proposed changes will narrow the beneficiaries of B-BBEE in ways that may undermine important gains in economic integration,” added Bernstein. CDE regards the achievement of the goals of B-BBEE as vital to the country’s future. We understand these goals to be an economy in which everyone can succeed irrespective of their race or gender, and in which legacies of historical discrimination are actively undone. However, we believe that these proposed amendments undermine these legitimate goals. What the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition is proposing The DTIC is proposing two significant amendments to the B-BBEE Codes, both affecting the Enterprise and Supplier Development (ESD) element, which is the primary mechanism through which empowerment policy is transmitted through the economy. These changes would: • Substantially reduce the points available to companies that procure from suppliers who are not 100% black-owned. For example, the value of doing business with a 51% black-owned firm would fall from 11 points (out of 27) to 3 points (out of 29); and • Introduce a Transformation Fund as an alternative mechanism for securing ESD points, allowing companies to secure ESD points by contributing 3% of net profit after tax. A policy that will narrow, not broaden, transformation CDE’s analysis indicates that the proposed procurement changes will shift incentives away from firms with majority black ownership towards those that are wholly black-owned. This would significantly alter the structure of existing supply chains. An influential analysis by Tusker, a major B-BBEE ratings firm, showed that of the nearly 54,000 businesses that have applied for B-BBEE certificates on their database, only about 10,000 are 100% black-owned, and around 90% of these are small firms. This raises serious questions about whether there are sufficient firms of this kind, across a wide enough range of sectors, for companies to meet preferential procurement targets under the revised system. The likely result is that many firms will be unable to achieve high B-BBEE contributor status through procurement alone. “The fact that thousands of firms have moved towards a more racially balanced shareholder mix has undeniably improved racial integration across the business sector, with enormous benefits for society and for political stability,” said Bernstein. “They did this because the existing Codes reward procurement from firms that are largely or majority black-owned. But this important social benefit will be impaired by the new proposal which rewards only 100% black-owned firms. This is likely to increase racial polarisation amongst business stakeholders, rather than integration and partnership,” she added. The proposed change to the preferential procurement rules will make it more difficult to accrue ESD points through companies’ supply chains. It seems as if this is intended to “encourage” companies to contribute to the Transformation Fund. A Transformation Fund with no clear framework CDE previously submitted comments on the DTIC’s Transformation Fund concept document in May 2025. Our concerns — which remain unaddressed — include: • The absence of clear objectives, governance structures, and success metrics; • Uncertainty about how the Fund would be operationalised; • Implausible funding targets, including the aim of raising R100 billion over five years; and • The risk — now materialised in the new proposals — that redirecting existing ESD spending will harm black-owned firms already integrated into supply chains. There is no formal, publicly available statement of what the Transformation Fund will do, what its targets will be, how it will operationalise its mandate, how it will be governed, how it will define success, etc. “It is literally impossible to assess the merits of these proposals,” Bernstein said. “The public is being asked to comment on amendments to the Codes that depend critically on their assessment of the pros and cons of a Fund whose parameters, mandate, governance and institutional architecture have not been disclosed. This is frankly outrageous,” added Bernstein. Serious legal and constitutional concerns CDE is also concerned by reports that the DTIC  has entered into a MoU with African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) to access up to US$3 billion in external financing linked to the proposed Transformation Fund, even though the Fund does not yet exist as a legally constituted entity. In CDE’s view, no binding commitments can be lawfully entered into before the Fund is properly established and any borrowing it might do is authorised within the fiscal framework. Any commitments that may have already been made could raise serious concerns in relation to the Public Finance Management Act and constitutional requirements governing public expenditure and borrowing. Officials who enter into unauthorised commitments may expose themselves to adverse audit findings, disciplinary action, and potential personal liability. CDE’s call: Withdraw and establish an independent public review of B-BBEE policies When CDE made its submission in response to the first Transformation Fund concept document in May 2025, we issued a call for a comprehensive, independent review of South Africa’s transformation policies to assess their effectiveness and costs. This review should be led by an independent panel, including economists, legal experts, business leaders, civil society representatives and especially black-owned enterprises affected by current mechanisms. It should evaluate which aspects of B-BBEE have succeeded and which have failed, and at what cost, using 20 years of available data. The goal should be to build a new consensus promoting inclusive growth, accountability, and tangible benefits for black and in particular disadvantaged South Africans. This call has not been heeded, and we strongly believe the GNU should commit to a public, expert-led review of the impact and costs of B-BBEE policies that have been pursued for the past 20 years. Instead, the DTIC has proposed this set of amendments to the B-BBEE codes that would narrow the beneficiaries of preferential procurement spending to an exceptionally small group of companies in which 100% of the shares are owned by black people, while strongly nudging ESD spending into a Transformation Fund whose parameters, mandate, governance and institutional architecture have not been publicly disclosed. “This is recklessness piled on recklessness,” said Bernstein. “The current proposals should be shelved until a proper review of B-BBEE has been conducted and its findings subjected to informed public debate. Approaching so serious a matter as economic transformation in this gung-ho style reflects badly on the DTIC and on government as a whole,” she added. Issued by Refiloe Benjamin on behalf of CDE, 30 March 2026 ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://www.politicsweb.co.za/documents/cde-calls-on-dtic-to-consider-opposition-to-its-re

Ann Bernstein and Stefan Schirmer | 30 March 2026 Almost 12.5-million South Africans are unemployed. Many of them are young people desperately trying to find their first job. However, President Cyril Ramaphosa recently said only that “too many South Africans remain unemployed”, and “too many young people struggle to find their first job”. In a country facing one of the world’s worst unemployment crises, those statements sound like a dramatic underestimation of the crisis. The scale of unemployment should continue to shock us. So too should its trajectory: things are getting worse, not better. Since Ramaphosa took office in 2018, the number of unemployed South Africans has risen from just fewer than 10-million to nearly 12.5-million. Apart from occasional, temporary improvements that are more likely to be statistical noise than anything else, the trend has been relentlessly upwards. Young people bear the brunt of this crisis. Almost 55% of South Africans aged 15–34 who want work cannot find it. About 7-million young people are unemployed, including many discouraged workers who would like to work but have given up actively searching. Most have not had a proper job. A central part of the government’s response has been to promise “work and livelihood opportunities through public and social employment programmes”. These programmes offer a degree of relief, albeit temporary. In truth, compared with the scale of the crisis they are little more than Band-Aids. They cannot change the structural realities of mass unemployment. South Africa will not solve unemployment without faster economic growth. Reaching 3% growth quickly — and then moving beyond it — must be a national priority. Only sustained expansion can create the millions of new jobs needed to reverse current trends. There is one piece of encouraging news. Over the past decade job creation has broadly kept pace with economic growth. In 2015–25 the economy grew at about 0.76% per year, while employment increased at about 0.77% annually — almost a one-to-one relationship. When growth accelerates, as it did during the 2004–08 expansion, many jobs can be created. So, let’s urgently go for much faster growth. It’s the only viable strategy to make a real dent in our unsustainable unemployment rate. However, there is one critical exception: young workers. Over the past decade youth employment fell by about 520,000 jobs. In other words, while the economy expanded modestly, employment among young people shrank by about 8%. Growth in South Africa thus creates jobs, but not for the young. This means even if economic growth improves, the economy will continue to struggle to absorb young job seekers. Why does growth benefit older workers but not the young? Young workers, by definition, lack experience. They are less proven, less predictable and often less productive than older workers. In more flexible labour markets this disadvantage is offset by experimentation: firms can hire young workers at wages that reflect their lower productivity and can let them go relatively easily if things do not work out. In South Africa that flexibility is severely constrained. When a firm advertises a vacancy it often faces hundreds, sometimes thousands, of applicants for only a handful of positions — far too many to evaluate properly. In a country where most job seekers have limited skills and long periods of unemployment behind them, filling a vacancy becomes a high-stakes screening exercise. Faced with so many applicants, employers minimise risk; they choose experience. That preference becomes structural exclusion when labour regulations turn every new hire into a potentially costly legal commitment. If an employer cannot adjust wages and faces expensive, time-consuming dismissal procedures when a hire does not work out, the safest choice is not to take the risk on an inexperienced worker. This is the wall of risk that keeps young people locked out. A healthy labour market is a ladder: a first job leads to experience, which leads to better jobs and upward mobility. In South Africa we have built something else — a fortress. Inside are workers with experience and protection. Outside are millions of young people who cannot get a foot in the door. If we want young South Africans to work, we must lower the risks and costs of hiring inexperienced workers. South Africa will not solve unemployment without faster economic growth. Reaching 3% growth quickly — and then moving beyond it — must be a national priority. Only sustained expansion can create the millions of new jobs needed to reverse current trends. The following reforms could help: The law should allow probation periods of up to 12 months for all new hires, regardless of job complexity. During this period employers should be able to terminate employment more easily if a worker proves unsuitable, while prohibiting dismissals that are automatically unfair, such as those based on discrimination. Probation should function as a genuine trial period rather than an irrevocable long-term commitment. The government should remove the automatic extension of bargaining council agreements to non-signatories. For many small firms, rural businesses and new entrants these agreements impose wage levels and conditions that make hiring high-risk, low-productivity workers unaffordable. Restrictions on labour brokers should be lifted. Labour brokers once provided important pathways into work, particularly for young people without networks or experience. South Africa needs more pathways into employment, not fewer. We must confront the failures of our education and skills systems. The basic education system continues to leave many young people poorly prepared for work. The skills system also frequently fails to equip them with usable training. The sector education & training authorities (Setas) are widely recognised as ineffective. Rather than attempting minor, piecemeal reform — such as Ramaphosa’s recently announced plan to “reform and reduce” them — they should be closed and replaced with employer-driven apprenticeships and high-quality private training programmes. Technical and vocational colleges must also be strengthened through partnerships with industry and a far larger expansion of work-based learning. South Africa’s youth unemployment crisis is already severe, and it continues to deepen. Young people are the majority of the unemployed and consistently find themselves at the back of the hiring queue. An economy that absorbs more labour requires real reform, not more public employment programmes. The goal must be to make it easier and less risky for firms to hire young workers in the ordinary course of doing business. That requires targeted changes in the laws regulating the terms of employment, real reform of the education system and a far more effective skills system. Without reform, economic growth will continue to benefit those already inside the labour market while young people remain locked out. As Nobel laureate Paul Romer once warned, if South Africa cannot solve the problem of getting young people into work, it may not matter what other problems we do solve. Bernstein is head of the Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE). Schirmer is CDE director of research. ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/sas-economy-is-failing-its-young-people

Belinda Bantham | 24 March 2026 Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges and universities are central to solving South Africa’s skills crisis, bridging the gap between practical training and academic knowledge to drive economic growth. It is within this context that the North-West University (NWU) and Vuselela TVET College held high-level talks on 23 March 2026, setting the stage for a strategic partnership aimed at reshaping skills development, strengthening research collaboration and expanding socio-economic impact. Leading the engagement were NWU principal and vice-chancellor, Prof. Bismark Tyobeka, and Vuselela TVET College principal Priscilla Lehoko. The discussions focused on how the two institutions can combine their strengths to respond more effectively to the country’s urgent skills shortages. Prof. Tyobeka made it clear that collaboration is no longer optional, but essential. “We are intentional about building collaborative frameworks that respond to national priorities,” he said. “We are also able to direct resources from our budgets to support infrastructure upgrades where possible, ensuring that partnerships such as this one lead to real outcomes.” He stressed that stronger alignment between universities and TVET colleges could unlock new postgraduate pathways while directly addressing the shortage of skilled artisans. “There is a clear gap in skills, especially in artisan development,” Prof. Tyobeka said. “By formalising relationships and identifying priority areas, we can work together to close these gaps.” He also pointed to the NWU’s planned School of Mines and Mining Engineering as a key opportunity, highlighting the critical role TVET colleges play in producing the technical skills required by the mining sector. Speaking from a TVET perspective, Priscilla said the partnership could be a turning point in strengthening research and innovation capacity. “Research and innovation are areas where universities can provide important support,” she said. “Our focus remains on technical skills development, and working with the NWU would strengthen our efforts.” She highlighted the urgent need to expand student exposure to occupational programmes and improve employability through stronger partnerships. Infrastructure challenges, along with declining participation in mathematics and science, remain pressing concerns. Ntsikie Kote-Nkomo, executive director for strategy and strategic projects, brought a broader economic lens to the discussion, calling for collaboration that directly responds to industry and value-chain demands. “We must continue asking what our economy needs and how we respond together,” she said. “Entrepreneurship is still underdeveloped, and we need to position it not only as an alternative to employment, but as a driver of economic participation.” She pointed to the NWU’s growing entrepreneurship ecosystem as a platform that could support high-performing TVET students and artisans, while also calling for greater recognition of TVET institutions' role in the economy. The conversation also opened the door to broader partnerships, including collaborations with local municipalities to strengthen service delivery by improving technical skills pipelines. Nkosinathi Tom, director for strategic partnerships, highlighted existing connections between student leadership structures at the two institutions and proposed formalising these engagements, including opportunities for Vuselela student leaders to participate in the NWU’s Student Leadership Academy. Both institutions agreed that formalising the partnership would unlock structured collaboration across key areas, including skills development, infrastructure support, entrepreneurship, and student development. ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://news.nwu.ac.za/nwu-and-vuselela-tvet-college-explore-strategic-collaboration-address-national-skills-gaps

Nkosinathi Mahlangu | 25 March 2026 Public discourse following this year’s National Budget has focused heavily on tax relief and easing pressure on household finances. That’s understandable. When the cost of living rises, any talk of relief tends to dominate the headlines. But amid the discussion about consumer relief and fiscal stability, one of the country’s most urgent structural challenges struggled to cut through the noise: youth unemployment. South Africa is a predominantly young nation, yet millions of school leavers, graduates and job seekers are still standing outside the economy looking for a way in. The growing number of young people who are not in employment, education or training should concern us far more than it currently does. While the Budget acknowledged economic reforms and skills development interventions, it offered little indication of how these will translate into real opportunities. At a time when the country is grappling with multiple crises – from crime to infrastructure failures – youth unemployment risks slipping down the national priority list. That would be a mistake. If anything, the issue sits at the centre of many of the challenges we face today. Growth alone will not solve youth unemployment   The Budget focuses heavily on infrastructure investment and economic reform, which has the potential to stimulate growth and unlock investment. But growth alone does not automatically open doors for first-time job seekers. Without clear planning, infrastructure projects can bypass the very communities where unemployment is highest. If South Africa is serious about tackling this crisis, major public investments must include youth-linked procurement targets, structured apprenticeship programmes and entry-level roles that prioritise young people in the communities where projects are implemented. Skills development must also translate into employment. Government has acknowledged that the current system has not delivered the outcomes originally intended, and the proposed shift toward a dual training model – combining classroom learning with practical workplace experience – is a welcome step. However, the real challenge lies in implementation. Too often, young people complete learnerships or short-term training programmes only to find themselves back where they started: qualified on paper but without workplace experience. A more co-ordinated approach is needed to close the persistent gap between the skills young people acquire and the needs of the economy. South Africa currently lacks a centralised database that connects training pathways with sectors where opportunities are emerging. Young people often complete degrees or certificates without a clear sense of where those skills are needed, while employers struggle to find candidates with relevant technical and workplace experience. Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges – which focus on practical and occupational skills – could play a far stronger role if their programmes were directly linked to infrastructure, construction and energy projects already planned across the country. In this way, national development projects can serve as training grounds where young people gain real experience. Infrastructure investment should not only build roads, rail and power systems. It should build careers. Youth employment must stay at the centre of the national agenda Youth unemployment cannot slip down the national priority list. Millions of people are entering adulthood desperate for a foothold in the economy, and the longer they remain locked out, the harder it becomes to change that reality. This is not a distant policy problem. It shapes what communities look like, how families survive and whether the country’s growth plans have any real meaning. South Africa does not lack programmes or good intentions aimed at youth development. The problem is that too many economic reforms, infrastructure projects and training initiatives still operate in isolation from each other. Youth unemployment is therefore more than a labour market statistic. It is a measure of whether economic reform is reaching the people who need it most. If young South Africans cannot find a way into the economy, the country’s broader reform agenda will struggle to deliver the progress it promises. ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article ar e those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://iol.co.za/ios/opinion/2026-03-25-amid-budget-talks-youth-unemployment-remains-a-pressing-concern-for-south-africa/

TUT | 24 March 2026 The Technology Station in Electronics (TSE) at TUT has empowered 89 youth and women from Mabopane, Pretoria, through a smartphone repair and entrepreneurship programme, boosting employability. The programme, offered by TSE at the Tshwane University of Technology, focuses on youth and women and combines smartphone repair skills with entrepreneurship development, aiming to improve employability and enable participants to start sustainable micro-enterprises in their communities. The initiative comes at a time when South Africa’s labour market remains under pressure. Statistics South Africa reported an official unemployment rate of 31.4% in the fourth quarter of 2025, while youth unemployment (15–34) stood at 43.8%. Funded by the Technology Innovation Agency, the training focused on practical, hands-on capability in smartphone repairs. Technical training conducted during February was followed by entrepreneurship training in the first week of March. Participants received intensive instruction in diagnosing common phone faults, safely dismantling devices, replacing components, reassembling units and performing final functional tests - skills aligned to immediate service opportunities in local communities. To strengthen the pathway from technical competence to income generation, the programme also included an entrepreneurship component delivered by TUT’s Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED). This covered key small-business fundamentals, including business setup, goal setting, market analysis, value chains and other essentials for establishing and managing a community-based service business. Sello Baloyi, Manager of the Mabopane Skills Centre of the City of Tshwane, welcomed the outcomes and the balanced approach followed by the training team. “I commend the TSE team for delivering a training programme that successfully balances theory and practical application. The inclusion of entrepreneurship development is particularly impressive, as it equips participants with the skills to start and sustain their own businesses,” he said. The TSE supports TUT’s institutional strategic plan to build an entrepreneurial university and strengthen community impact by developing individuals who can become employment creators while expanding access to practical services within townships. ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://www.tut.ac.za/newsroom/all-news/2026/electronics-repair-programme-empowers-youth-and-women.php

Clause 2.4.2 of Statement 400 of the Amended General B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice  allocates Bonus Points for creating one or more jobs as a direct result of a Supplier Development or Enterprise Development  intervention.   The necessary evidence varies between B-BBEE Rating Agencies. Generally, however, a letter confirming job creation from the Beneficiary will serve as such evidence or a Signed Employee contract. The letter of confirmation must affirm that the intervention created at least one new job. Some confirmations may include being administered by a Commissioner of Oaths.  This must be undertaken by the Beneficiary and must include (not limited to):   An organisation’s full name, physical address, postal address, and registration number; A Beneficiary’s full company name, physical address, postal address, and registration number; The Enterprise Development or Supplier Development commenced; The date of the contribution; The number of new positions due to the intervention; and The names of the new employees;   Enterprise & Supplier Development Services   are available to assist Members meeting requirements for Job Creation.

The most significant risk to an organisation meeting its Preferential Procurement targets is fraudulent B-BBEE Statuses. They not only go against the spirit of B-BBEE, but they put an organisation at risk, as fraudulent B-BBEE Credentials generally only reveal themselves at the time of an organisation’s B-BBEE Verification.   The B-BBEE Commission's website contains a List of known Fraudulent / Invalid B-BBEE Credentials currently in circulation.   If any Members have suspicions about B-BBEE Credentials currently, Certificate Collection Services  is on hand to assist with validation of their authenticity.

William Saunderson-Meyer | 23 March 2026 More than R1 trillion has been transferred to fewer than 100 politically-connected individuals. The scale of the damage that the ANC has inflicted defies easy comprehension. Take economics, where black economic empowerment (BEE) – I’ll flag my bias by ignoring the government’s preferred “broad-based” acronym, B-BBEE – has become perhaps the most fiercely contested terrain in South African politics. Here, the numbers are so sprawling, the structures so opaque, and the beneficiaries so often concealed that the public cannot see the wood for the trees. BEE payouts benefit a few politically connected individuals Fortunately, one of our most respected intellectuals, Prof William Gumede, has rendered the chaos comprehensible by reducing it to two savagely memorable propositions: more than R1 trillion has been transferred to fewer than 100 politically connected individuals, and the same people are “empowered” over and over again; and in mining alone, 46 politically connected people secured 60% of BEE deals, becoming multimillionaires overnight. Gumede is no fringe polemicist. He is attached to the school of governance at Wits University. That is why the backlash has been so furious. He has incurred the displeasure of President Cyril Ramaphosa, been attacked for “sabotaging” SA’s credibility in international investment markets and been challenged to “prove” his numbers. He is also the target of a campaign of character assassination. This is not a question that can be settled with a neat spreadsheet, though Gumede, this week, marshalled a formidable body of evidence in a private presentation to the Black Management Forum, an organisation representing many beneficiaries of the system. It was received, he tells me, in “total silence.” BEE operates across three deeply interlinked arenas. There are private-sector ownership deals. There is public procurement. And there were the privatisation transactions of the early democratic years, where BEE participation was built into the disposal of state assets. Some of Gumede’s source material is political dynamite. For example, the claim that 46 ANC fellow-travellers snagged 60% of BEE mining deals rests, he says, on research done in 2015 by a top-tier audit firm and a major bank for the Chamber of Mines. The study, which was leaked to Gumede, remains confidential, and to this day, none of those involved will agree to be named. So, while the evidentiary problem is real, that is not the same thing as saying the underlying claim is fanciful. Evidence points to systemic abuse, public sees little impact Starting with the part that is actually visible, Intellidex calculated in 2015 that BEE deals by the 100 largest JSE-listed companies had generated R317 billion in net value by the end of 2014. Then there is the much larger and murkier reservoir of procurement. Gumede notes the state now spends “almost R1 trillion” a year this way, and cites Treasury official Willie Mathebula’s evidence to the Zondo commission, that of the 2017 procurement Bill of R800 billion, more than half was lost to “intentional abuse of the system”, including the manipulation of BEE rules for personal benefit. Few, if any, of the ANC-linked billionaires amassed their fortunes through the slow, mundane business of building companies from scratch. The official B-BBEE Commission has itself recorded major empowerment transactions worth tens and even hundreds of billions. At the end of the day, the proof of Gumede’s thesis lies all around us. The heavily compromised ANC intelligentsia may refuse to see it but, on the ground, the evidence is mounting. Social surveys and voting patterns increasingly suggest that ordinary South Africans understand that the benefits of BEE are not what was promised – and are certainly not flowing to them. ‘Disclaimer - The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’. https://www.citizen.co.za/news/opinion/the-real-truth-of-b-bbee/