top of page



Asset 4.png



Israel Ojoko | 25 February 2024

Delve into the implications of Judge Motha's inquiry on racial diversity within South Africa's legal profession, challenging the status quo and calling for meaningful change towards inclusivity.

Imagine stepping into a courtroom where the matter at hand delves deep into the heart of black economic empowerment, only to find the legal team assembled before you strikingly homogeneous, missing the very representation it seeks to address.

This scenario, unfolding at the Pretoria High Court, caught the discerning eye of Judge Mandlenkosi Motha, sparking a critical conversation on racial diversity within the legal profession in South Africa.

In a case centered around the pivotal issue of black economic empowerment, the absence of any black lawyers among the four white advocates representing the case prompted Judge Motha to demand an explanation, a move that echoes far beyond the courtroom walls.

The Inquiry That Stirred the Pot

Through a simple yet profound email inquiry, Judge Motha not only questioned the composition of the legal team but also spotlighted the broader issue of racial inclusivity in the legal field.

This action, as reported by City Press, underscores a lingering disconnect between the principles of black economic empowerment and the real-world practices within one of the country's most esteemed professions. The case, inherently tied to addressing racial and economic disparities, found its integrity questioned by the very makeup of its advocates.

A Mirror to the Legal Profession

The response to Judge Motha's query is yet to unfold, but the implications of his action reverberate deeply. It serves as a mirror, reflecting the challenges and progress—or lack thereof—towards achieving racial diversity within South Africa's legal profession.

The legal field, renowned for its role in upholding justice and equality, is now under the microscope, challenged to reassess its commitment to these very principles in its ranks. This incident, while isolated, is emblematic of the systemic barriers that persist, hindering the full realization of inclusivity and representation.

Looking Ahead: The Path to Inclusivity

The conversation ignited by Judge Motha's email is not just about the composition of a legal team in a single case. It is a call to action for the entire legal community and beyond. As South Africa continues to navigate the complexities of racial equality and economic empowerment, the legal profession's role in embodying these principles becomes increasingly paramount.

The challenge laid forth by Judge Motha is not merely a question of diversity for appearance's sake; it is an imperative to align practice with principle, ensuring that the legal teams tasked with addressing issues of racial disparity truly reflect the diversity of the society they serve.

The unfolding response to this scenario will be telling of the legal profession's readiness to confront and rectify imbalances within its ranks. It is a pivotal moment that may well define the path towards genuine inclusivity and representation in one of society's cornerstone professions.

As the legal community reflects on Judge Motha's probing inquiry, it stands at a crossroads, with the power to reinforce the status quo or to embrace change, paving the way for a more equitable and representative legal system in South Africa.

‘Disclaimer - The views expressed here are not necessarily those of the BEE CHAMBER’.


bottom of page